Introducing a Model for the Methodological Development of Information Literacy Studies

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Information Science and Knowledge Studies, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Information science and knowledge studies, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Prof., Dept. of Information Science and Knowledge Studies, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Objective:The current research aims to examine the methodological frameworks employed in scholarly articles on information literacy. Based on these frameworks, it seeks to propose a new model for information literacy studies to contribute to methodological development.
Method: In the present study, a mixed-method framework was used to achieve the results. The research population consisted of 682 Persian and English articles in the field of information literacy published between 1992 and 2023. Using theoretical sampling, articles with methodological originality were selected, while similar or redundant articles were excluded. Ultimately, 193 articles were chosen as the sample for analysis. First, through a categorization process, the studies in the field of information literacy were divided into three approaches: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed. Next, thematic analysis was used to identify the methodological frameworks of the selected articles, and their distinct methodological ideas and themes were extracted. Finally, a model for the methodological development of studies in this field was proposed, incorporating Roy Bhaskar's ideas and the concept classification method.
Results: Based on the research's output model, the methodological frameworks were categorized into three levels: empirical knowledge, procedural knowledge, and perceptual knowledge. The level of empirical knowledge is considered the foundational level, encompassing basic methodologies. It generally includes methods used to gain an understanding of the general context of the subject under study, such as surveys, experimental methods, Delphi studies, and similar methodological frameworks. The level of procedural knowledge represents the intermediate level of information literacy research, primarily focusing on investigating the processes, steps, patterns, and procedures involved in acquiring information literacy. This level goes beyond empirical knowledge by examining the steps, stages, and processes, as well as how literacy is achieved. The level of perceptual knowledge is the third and highest level of information literacy research. At this level, the researchers aim to study contradictions, conflicts, and the dialectical interactions among actors in obtaining information, as well as the structures that limit access.
Conclusions: Research in the field of information literacy, considering the methods employed thus far and in light of the Bhaskar model, should ideally begin with empirical studies, proceed to procedural studies, and conclude with interrogative studies. The one-dimensional nature of research in this field, along with the failure to follow this sequence, often leads to fragmented outcomes and a lack of data enrichment throughout the process. This, in turn, diminishes the effectiveness and impact of the findings

Keywords


Abbaszadeh, Z., Mahmoodi, A., Kordestani, F., & Shariarmadari, M. (2020). Identification of information literacy status of teachers and provide a suitable pattern (Case study: Education Qom city). Journal of Modern Thoughts in Education, 15(3), 23-44. [in Persian]. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.20081138.1399.15.3.2.2
Abdi, S. E., Partridge, H., Bruce, C., & Watson, J. (2019). Skilled immigrants: A resettlement information literacy framework. Journal of Documentation, 75(4), 892-908. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2019-0034
ACRL (2016). Framework for information literacy for higher education. Retrieved November, 02, 2024, from: https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
Anunobi, C., & Udem, O. K. (2014). Information literacy competencies: A conceptual analysis. Journal of Applied Information Science and Technology, 7(2), 64-80. https://www.jaistonline.org/AnunobiUdem_vol7no2_2k14.pdf    
Atmojo, I., Ardiansyah, R., Sapurtri, D., & Adi, F. (2021). Efforts to improve digital literacy skills for teachers through information literacy training. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education (ICLIQE '21). Association for Computing Machinery, 67, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3516875.3516956
Bad, J. (2016). Critical Realism of Roy Bhaskar. In: Critical Theory for Library and Information Science. Edited by Gloria J. Leckie, Lisa M. Given, and John E. Bushman. Tehran: National Public Libraries Organization; Chapar. [in Persian].
Bapte, V. D. (2020). Information literacy: A scientometric assessment of global research output. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 40(1), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.40.1.14686
Batool, S. H., Rehman, A. U., & Sulehri, I. (2022). The current situation of information literacy education and curriculum design in Pakistan: A discovery using Delphi method. Library Hi Tech, 40(6), 1705-1720. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-02-2021-0056
Bazbin, M., cheshme sohrabi, M., & Moradi, M. (2013). A study of the relationship between information literacy and evidence-based librarianship: A case study of librarians of academic library of Kermanshah. Library and Information Science Research, 3(1), 133-152. [in Persian] https://doi.org/10.22067/riis.v3i2.17029
Behrens, S. (1994). A Conceptual analysis and historical overview of information literacy. College & Research Libraries, 55(4), 309-322. https://doi.org/10.5860/CRL_55_04_309  
Bhaskar, R. (1993). Dialectic: The Pulse of Freedom. First Edition. London: Verso.
Boekhorst, A. K. & Britz, J. J. (2004). Information literacy at school level: A comparative study between the Netherlands and South Africa. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 70 (2), 63-71. https://doi.org/10.7553/70-2-666  
Budd, J. (2010). Roy Bhaskar's Critical Realism. In: Critical Theory for Library and Information Science, Edited by Gloria J. Leckie, Lisa M. Given, John E. Buschman, London: Bloomsbury Academic, 29-41. [in Persian]   
Bury, S. (2016). Learning from faculty voices on information literacy: Opportunities and challenges for information literacy education. Reference Services Review, 44(3), 237-252. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-11-2015-0047
Chang, C. P., & Hsu, P. C. (2015). The correlation between employee information literacy and employee creativity. Quality & Quantity, 49(1), 221-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9983-5
Curl, S. (2001). Subramanyam revisited: Creating a new model for information literacy instruction. College & Research Libraries, 62(5), 455-464. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.62.5.455
Davids, Z., & Omar, Y. (2018). Implementing a certificate of information literacy programme and engaging with faculty: A case study of the Cape Peninsula University of Technology. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 84(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.7553/84-1-1716
Daviran-Keshavarzi A., Nosratollah S. and Shahnooshi-Frooshani, M. (2022). Identifying factors and components affecting the measurement of journalists' information literacy. Quartely Journal of Intercultural Studies, 17(52), 39-72. [in Persian] https://doi.org/20.1001.1.17358663.1401.17.52.1.8  
Diehm, R., & Lupton, M. (2012). Approaches to learning information literacy: A phenomenographic study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38(4), 217-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.05.003
Harden, M. (2019). First-year students and the framework: Using topic modeling to analyze student understanding of the framework for information literacy for higher education. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 14(2), 51-69. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29514  
Hebert, A. (2018). Information literacy skills of first-year library and information science graduate students: An exploratory study. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 13(3), 32-52. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29404
Julien, H. (2000). Information literacy instruction in canadian academic libraries: Longitudinal trends and international comparisons. College and Research Libraries, 61(6), 510-523. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.61.6.510
Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by Paul Guyer & Allen W. Wood. Cambridgeshire, England: Cambridge University Press.
Karami, S., Sharifi, S. M., & Janavi, E. (2018). Identifying solutions for increasing media and information literacy among faculty members and students of Iranian universities. Communication Research, 24(92), 99-124. [in Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22082/cr.2017.58194.1270
Keykha, B. (2021). Methodological analysis of information literacy research in the context of Iranian public libraries. Religion & Communication28(1), 328-305. [in Persian]. https://doi.org/10.30497/rc.2021.75919
Keykha B., & Ghaebi A. (2022). Prioritization and investigation of the direction of influence and susceptibility of components of information literacy skills based on techniques of multi-criteria decision-making and paired comparisons. Human Information Interaction, 9(1), 73-87. [in Persian]. http://hii.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2867-fa.html  
Kurbanoglu, S. (2013). An analysis of the concept of information literacy. Proceedings of the International Conference of the Media and Information Literacy for Knowledge Society (June 24-28), 1-42.
Latham, D., & Gross, M. (2013). Instructional preferences of first-year college students with below-proficient information literacy skills: A focus group study. College & Research Libraries, 74(5), 430-449. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-343
Leeder, C., Markey, K., & Yakel, E. (2012). A faceted taxonomy for rating student bibliographies in an online information literacy game. College & Research Libraries, 73(2), 115-133. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-223
Marefat, R., Mansourian, Y., & Zerehsaz, M. (2018). Why information literacy is needed? A qualitative study about the viewpoints of Semnan University psychology students. Library and Information Science Research, 8(1), 197-220. [in Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22067/riis.v0i0.63307
Mirbakhsh, S., Soltanifar, M., & Nasiri, B. (2022). Discourses on teaching informing and media literacy in Iran. Religion & Communication, 29(1), 254-223. [in Persian]. https://doi.org/10.30497/rc.2022.76188
Nazari, M. (2006). Designing, testing, implementing and evaluating information literacy curriculumn for postgraduate disciplines courses. Library and Information Sciences, 9(2), 53-92. [in Persian] https://lis.aqr-libjournal.ir/article_44228_en.html
Ngo, H., Pickard, A., & Walton, G. (2018). An information literacy teaching model for Vietnam’s schools. Global Knowledge Memory and Communication, 68(3), 191-206. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-05-2018-0047
Parirokh, M., Arastoopoor, S., & Naderi, M. R. (2012). Efficiency of information iiteracy workshops for post-graduate students: A research based on in-context approach. Library and Information Science Research1(2), 201-224. [in Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22067/riis.v1i2.8663
Pinto, M., Fernandez-Pascul, R., & Marco, F. (2019). Self-learning of information literacy competencies in higher education: The perspective of social sciences students. College & Research Libraries, 80(2), 215-237. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.2.215
Poursalehi N., fahimnia F., Bazargan A. and Nakhoda M. (2017). Nature of information literacy in elementary schools: Case study of Persian literature in fourth grade. Human Information Interaction, 3(4), 23-40. [in Persian]. http://hii.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2605-fa.html
Raish, V., & Rimland, E. (2016). Employer Perceptions of critical information literacy skills and digital badges. College & Research Libraries, 77(1), 87-113. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.77.1.87
Ranjbary, F., Naghshineh, N., & Smaeili Givi, M. R. (2018). Re-conceptualization of information literacy for library software designer's team. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 33(4), 1659-1684. [in Persian]. https://doi.org/10.35050/JIPM010.2018.029
Saunders, L. (2009). The future of information literacy in academic libraries: A Delphi study. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 9(1), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.0.0030
Saunders, L. (2017). Connecting information literacy and social justice: Why and how. Communication in Information Literacy, 11 (1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2017.11.1.47  
 Sturges, P. and Gastinger, A. (2010). Information literacy as a human right. Libri, 60 (3), 195-202.  https://doi.org/10.1515/libr.2010.017  
Sundin, O. (2008). Negotiations on information‐seeking expertise: A study of web‐based tutorials for information literacy. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 24-44. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844141
Ukachi, N. B. (2015). Information literacy of students as a correlate of their use of electronic resources in university libraries in Nigeria. The Electronic Library, 33(3), 486-501. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-05-2013-0085
Verma, M., & Shukla, R. (2019). Mapping the research trends on information literacy of selected countries during 2008 2017: A scientometric analysis. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 39(3), 125-130. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.39.3.14007
Verma, M. K., & Shukla, R. (2021). Information literacy skills among the masters students of social sciences departments of Mizoram University and Tezpur University: A comparative study. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 41(5), 374-384. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.41.5.16399
Wakimoto, D. K. (2010). Information literacy instruction assessment and improvement through evidence based practice: A mixed method study. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 5(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.18438/B80616
Willson, G., & Angell, K. (2017). Mapping the Association of College and Research Libraries information literacy framework and nursing professional standards onto an assessment rubric. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 150-154. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.39
Yevelson-Shorsher,  A., & Bronstein, J. (2018). Three perspectives on information literacy in academia: Talking to librarians, faculty, and students. Colledge and Research Libraries, 79(4), 535-553. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.4.535