Identifying academic Librarians' mentalities about Self-leadership and presenting model.

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Information Science and Knowledge Studies,, faculty of humanities, Islamic Azad University of Hamedan, Hamedan, Iran

2 Department of Information Science and Knowledge Studies, Islamic Azad University of Hamedanm, Hamedan, Iran

3 Department of Information Science and Knowledge Studies, Islamic Azad University of Hamedan, Hamedan, Iran

Abstract

Purpose: Self-leadership is the process of influencing oneself to achieve goals .the purpose of this study is identifying academic Librarians' mentalities about Self-leadership and presenting model.
Methodology: The research is applied and we used Q methodology, content analysis and Delphi. In the first part, the statistical population is librarians and managers of Iranian academic libraries, and in the second part, the faculty members of the Department of Information Science as well as management. The sampling method is theoretical. The research tool was a questionnaire and semi-structural interview. Factor analysis conducted by SPSS.
Findings: Seven mental patterns were identified and named. organizational self-leadership model was presented with 5 dimensions, 23 components and 56 indicators.
Conclusion: The hierarchical, Conservative, team-oriented, self-reliant, self-efficate, empowering, and self-evaluation pattern. The dimensions of organizational self-leadership model include procedural, strategical, organizational, cultural, and socio-psychosocial.
Keywords: Organizational Self-leadership, Mental Patterns, Academic Libraries, Academic Librarians, Iranian Universities, Q Methodology, Delphi, Model

Keywords


منابع
آقابابایی، راضیه(1392). بررسی روابط چندگانه راهبردهای رهبری مثبت‌گرا و راهبردهای خود رهبری با میزان کاربست مؤلفه‌های سازمان کوانتومی در دانشگاه اصفهان و دانشگاه تهران. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان.
خوشگویان فرد، علیرضا(1386). روش‌شناسی کیو.تهران: مرکز تحقیقات صداوسیما.
دانایی‌فرد، حسن؛ حسینی، یعقوب؛ شیخ‌ها، روزبه(1392). روش‌شناسی کیو: شالوده‌های نظری و چارچوب انجام پژوهش. تهران: صفار.
مورهد، جی؛ گریفین،آر. دبلیو(1391)، رفتار سازمانی،ترجمۀدکتر سیدمهدی الوانی و دکتر غلامرضا معمارزاده، تهران: انتشارات مروارید.
نقره‌کار، عبدالحمید؛ مظفر، فرهنگ؛ نقره‌کار، سلمان (1389). «مدل‌سازی»؛ روشی مفید برای پژوهش‌های میان رشته ای (نمونه موردی: امکان سنجی بهره‌گیری از آموزه‌های «اندیشۀ اسلامی» در «آموزش معماری»،  معماری و شهرسازی ایران، 1(1).                                                                                             
References
 
Alberts, D.J. (2007). A model of multidiscipline teams in knowledge-creating organizations. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 13(5/6), 172-183.
Anderson, R. (2007). Thematic content analysis (TCA). Descriptive presentation of qualitative data, 1-4.
Berson, Y., Da'as, R. A., & Waldman, D. A. (2015). How do leaders and their teams bring about organizational learning and outcomes?. Personnel Psychology, 68(1), 79-108.
Bryant, A. and A. L. Kazan (2013). Self-leadership: How to Become a More Successful, Efficient, and Effective Leader from the Inside Out, McGraw-Hill.
Costa, A. C., Fulmer, C. A., & Anderson, N. R. (2018). Trust in work teams: An integrative review, multilevel model, and future directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(2), 169–184.
Coun, M. M., Peters, P. C., & Blomme, R. R. (2019). ‘Let's share!’The mediating role of employees' self-determination in the relationship between transformational and shared leadership and perceived knowledge sharing among peers. European Management Journal, 37(4), 481-491.
D'Intino, R. S., Goldsby, M. G., Houghton, J. D., & Neck, C. P. (2007). Self-leadership: A process for entrepreneurial success. Journal of leadership & organizational studies, 13(4), 105-120.
Elloy, D. F. (2008). The relationship between self-leadership behaviors and organization variables in a self-managed work team environment. Management Research News, 31(11), 801-810.
Furtner, M. R., Rauthmann, J. F., & Sachse, P. (2015). Unique self-leadership: A bifactor model approach. Leadership, 11(1), 105-125.
Goldsby, M. (2007). Self-leadership: A process for entrepreneurial success.Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13, 105-120
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research, 2(163-194), 105.
 
Houghton, J. D., & Yoho, S. K. (2005). Toward a contingency model of leadership and psychological empowerment: when should self-leadership be encouraged?. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11(4), 65-83.‏
Hyrkäs, K., Appelqvist-Schmidlechner, K., & Oksa, L. (2003). Validating an instrument for clinical supervision using an expert panel. International Journal of nursing studies, 40(6), 619-625.
Jacobs, C. D., & Heracleous, L. T. (2005). Answers for questions to come: reflective dialogue as an enabler of strategic innovation. Journal of Organizational change management, 18(4), 338-352.
Malinowski, T. (2004). The 2003 OCLC Environmental Scan: Pattern Recognition: A Report to the OCLC Membership. Serials Review, 30(3), 254-256
Mathieu, J. E., Wolfson, M. A., & Park, S. (2018). The evolution of work team research since Hawthorne. American Psychologist, 73(4), 308.
Mayfield, J., Mayfield, M., & Neck, C. P. (2017). Speaking to the self: How motivating language links with self-leadership. International Journal of Business Communication, 2329488417731861.‏
Neck, C. P., & Houghton, J. D. (2006). Two decades of self-leadership theory and research: Past developments, present trends, and future possibilities. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 21, 270-295.
Neck C. P., & Manz C. C. (2010). Mastering Self-Leadership. Empowering Yourself for Personal Excellence. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
Peters, P., Den Dulk, L., & de Ruijter, J. (2010). May I work from home? Views of the employment relationship reflected in line man‌agers’ telework attitudes in six financial-sector organizations. Equal‌ity, Diversity and Inclusion, 29(5), 517–531.
Potter, W. J., & Levine‐Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27(3), 258-284.
Shahhosseini, Z., Simbar, M., Ramezankhani, A., & Majd, H. A. (2011). Designing and       psychometric properties of a questionnaire for assessing female adolescents' health needs. Journal of School of Public Health & Institute of Public Health Research, 9(1).
 
Shaw, j.d., Gupta, N. & Delery, J.E.(2001). Congruence between technology and compensation systems: Implications for strategy implementation. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 379-386
Spreitzer, G. M., Cameron, L., & Garrett, L. (2017). Alternative work arrangements: Two images of the new world of work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 473e499
 
Stewart, G. L., Courtright, S. H., & Manz, C. C. (2019). Self-Leadership: A Paradoxical Core of Organizational Behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 47-67.
Tata, J. , & Prasad, S. (2004). Team self-management, organizational structure, and judgments of team effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Issues, 16: 248-265.
Wageman, R. (2001). How leaders foster self-managing team effectiveness: Design choices versus hands-on coaching. Organization Science, 12, 559–577
Webler, T., Danielson, S., & Tuler, S. (2009). Using Q Method to Reveal Social Perspectives in Environmental Research. Greenfield MA: Social and Environmental Research Institute.
Widyani, A. A. D., Sarmawa, I. W. G., & Dewi, I. G. A. M. (2017). The roles of knowledge sharing in mediating the effect of self-efficacy and self-leadership toward innovative behavior. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, 19(2), 112-117.‏