Definition of Information from the Semiotics Lens and Peirce’s Triad model of sign: A Review of the Most Important Researches in the Field

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. of Knowledge and Information Science, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Alzahra, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of AL Zahra, Tehran

3 alzahra university

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this research is to study the concept of information through the lens of semiotics, especially the Peirce’s sign model.
Methodology: This study is an analytical study of researches on the concept of information based on semiotics in the field of information science as well as a review of researches that has defined information in the context of information systems. Information science is an interdisciplinary field that has used the concepts, patterns, and theories of other sciences to explain some of the concepts in its subject areas. One of the sciences that is very similar to information science is semiotics: The purpose of this research is to study the concept of information through the lens of semiotics, especially the Peirce’s sign model.
Results: An analytical study of researches that have used theories of semiotics in various fields of information science showed that among the concepts, patterns and theories in semiotics, " Saussure's dyadic model of sign and Peirce’s triad model of sign were the most widely used semiotic models in this field. Among these two models, Peirce’s triad model of sign was more used in information science.
Conclusions: If information is considered as a sign, a better explanation of it can be provided based on the characteristics of the sign because the information is carried by a variety of signs. On the other hand, the definition of information from the lens of semiotics, in particular, Peirce’s Triad model of sign information divides into two types "passive information" and "active information". And thereby take into account both the ontology and the epistemology of information

Keywords


بیگدلی، زاهد؛ و شاهینی، شبنم (1393). پیچیدگی و تکامل مفاهیم اطلاعات و رفتار اطلاعاتی. تعامل انسان و اطلاعات، 1 (3)، 183-190. https://hii.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2131-fa.html
چندلر، دانیل (1394). مبانی نشانه‌شناسی. ترجمه مهدی پارسا، تهران: سوره مهر.
رضوی‌فر، املی؛ و غفاری، حسین (1390). نشانه‌شناسی پیرس در پرتو فلسفه، معرفت‌شناسی و نگرش وی به پراگماتیسم. فلسفه، 39 (2)، 5-37.
ریسمانباف، امیر، و فتاحی، رحمت‌اله (1395). بازشناختی از دانش‌شناسی: جستارهایی در علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی. تهران: کتابدار.
References
Almeida, C. C. de, Fujita, M. S. L., Marjorie dos Reis, D. (2013). Peircean semiotics and subject indexing: contributions of speculative grammar and pure logic. Knowledge Organization, 40 (4), 225-241.
Andersen, P. B. (1997). A theory of Computer Semiotics: Semiotic Approaches to Construction and Assessment of Computer Systems (2nd Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Artandi, S. (1973). Information concepts and their utility. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24 (4). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240403
Artandi, S. (1976). Machine indexing: linguistic and semiotic implications. JASIS, 27 (4), 235.
Barros, C. M. de, & Cafe, L. M. A. (2012). Semiotics Studies in the Information Science: Interdisciplinarities Reports. Perspect. Ciênc. Inf., 17 (3), 18-33.
Bates, M. J. (2005). Information and knowledge: An evolutionary framework for information science. Information Research, 10 (4), paper 239. http://informationr.net/ir/10-4/paper239.html
Boell, S. K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2015). What is ‘information’ beyond a definition? International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS).
Brier, S. (2004). Cybersemiotics and the problems of the information-processing paradigm as a candidate for a unified science of information behind. Library trends. 52(3): 629-557.
Brier, S. (2006). The foundation of LIS in information science and semiotics. Libreas, 52(3).
Buckland, M. K. (1991). Information as thing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 351-360.
Friedman, A., & Smiraglia, R. P. (2013). Nodes and arcs: Concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization. Journal of Documentation, 69 (1), 27-48.
Friedman, A., & Thellefsen, M. (2011). Concept theory and semiotics in knowledge organization. Journal of Documentation, 67 (4), 644-674.
Gonzales, R. (1997). Hypermedia Data Modeling, Coding and Semiotics. Proceedings of the IEEE, 85 (7), 1111-1140.
Huang, S.-C. (2006). A semiotic view of information: semiotics as a foundation of LIS research in information behavior. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 43 (1). http://hdl.handle.net/10760/8796
Latham, K. F. (2011). Museum object as document: using Buckland’s information concepts to understand museum experiences. Journal of Documentation, 68 (1), 45-71.
Liu, K. (2000). Semiotics in information systems engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mai, J.-E. (2001). Semiotics and indexing: An analysis of the subject indexing process. Journal of Documentation, 57 (5), 591-622.
Mingers, J., & Willcocks, L. (2017). An integrative semiotic methodology for IS research. Information and Organization, 27 (1), 591-622.
Noth, W. (2011). Representation and reference according to Peirce. International Journal of Signs and Semiotic Systems, 1 (2), 28-39.
Peirce, C. S. (1960). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce: Edited by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss: Principles of philosophy and elements of logic (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1974). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.‏
Peirce, C. S. (1998). The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (Vol. 2). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Powell, S. C. (1953). Charles S. Peirce, semiosis, and the "mind". ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 10 (3), 201-208.
Raber, D., Budd, J. M. (2003). Information as sign: Semiotics and information science. Journal of Documentation, 59 (5), 507-522.
Rowley, J. (2007). The wisdom hierarchy: Representations of the DIKW Hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 33 (2), 163-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506070706
Sørensen, B., Thellefsen, T., & Thellefsen, M. (2016). The meaning creation process, information, emotion, knowledge, two objects, and significance-effects: Some peircean remarks. Semiotica, 208: 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0117
Stamper, R. (1991). The Semiotic Framework for Information Systems Research, in Information Systems research: Contemporary Approaches & Emergent Traditions, H.-E. Nissen, H.K. Klein and R. Hirschheim (eds.), Amsterdam: North Holland.
Stamper, R. (1993). A Semiotic Theory of Information and Information Systems. Proceedings of the Joint ICL/University of Newcastle Seminar on the Teaching of Computer Science, Part IX: Information.
Stamper, R., Liu, K., Hafkamp, M., & Ades, Y. (2000). Understanding the roles of signs and norms in organizations - A semiotic approach to information systems design. Behaviour and Information Technology, 19 (1), 15-27.
Thellefsen, M. (2003). The role of special language in relation to knowledge organization. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 40 (1), 206-212.
Thellefsen, M. (2010). Knowledge Organization, Concepts, Signs: A Semeiotic Framework. Ph.D. Thesis. Royal School of Library and Information Science.
Thellefsen, T., Sørensen, B., & Thellefsen, M. (2003). Problems concerning the process of subject analysis and the practice of indexing. Semiotica-la Haye then Berlin, 144 (1/4). https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2003.022
Thellefsen, T., & Thellefsen, M. (2004). Pragmatic semiotics and knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, 31 (3), 177-187.
Thellefsen, T., Thellefsen, M., & Sørensen, B. (2013). Emotion, information, and cognition, and some possible consequences for library and information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 64 (8), 1735-1750.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22858
 Thellefsen, T., Thellefsen, M., & Sørensen, B. (2014). A pragmatic semeiotic perspective on the concept of information need and its relevance for knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, 40 (4), 213-224.
Thellefsen, T., Thellefsen, M., & Sørensen, B. (2015). The concept of information in library and information science a field in search of its boundaries: 8 short comments concerning information. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 22 (1), 57-80.
Thellefsen, T., Thellefsen, M., & Sørensen, B. (2018). Information as Signs: A Semiotic Analysis of the Information Concept, Determining its Ontological and Epistemological Foundations. Journal of Documentation, 74 (2), 372-382.
Warner, J. (1990). Semiotics, Information Science, Documents and Computers. Journal of Documentation, 46 (1), 16-32.
Wells, M. J. (2015). Social Semiotics as Theory and Practice in Library and Information Science. Journal of Documentation, 71 (4): 691-708.
Wikipedia (2017). Semiotic Theory of Charles Sanders Peirce.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, UK: Blackwell.
Zins, C. (2006). Redefining Information Science: from Information Science to Knowledge Science. Journal of Documentation, 62 (4), 447-461.