Reasons for Retraction of Iranian Articles: A Systematic Review

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Information science and knowledge studies. Faculty of management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to explore the reasons of the retraction of Iranian researchers’ articles in scientific journals.
Methods: To do this, we set a systematic review. The research population includes all articles that, in some way, have addressed the reasons for the retraction of Iranian researchers’ articles in international journals and publications. The most important global and Iranian scientific databases were searched for this purpose.
Results: Ultimately, out of 559 initially identified articles, through title and abstract review, removal of duplicates, and precise text reading, 19 relevant articles were selected. Additionally, the reasons provided by the RetractionWatch database (https://retractionwatch.com) regarding the retraction of Iranians articles, were processed, recorded, and compared with the results of the systematic review. The research findings indicated that the most significant reasons for retraction of international articles of Iranian researchers (in no particular order) are: 1. plagiarism, 2. duplicate publication, 3. peer-review issues, 4. authorship disputes, and 5. data issues and errors.
Conclusions: Given the sensitivity of research matters and the topic of research misconduct, policymakers in the research domain as well as officials from ministries, organizations, and universities can utilize the findings of this study to strengthen research ethics and prevent various forms of research misconduct. Considering the aforementioned reasons, it seems that education, attention to the topic of research integrity, precise oversight, and the use of technologies such as similarity detection and research management softwares are the most vital strategies in this regard. Moreover, it would be recommended that research experts held the sessions related to research misbehavior.

Keywords


References
Abbasian, Z., & Rajabzadeh Assarha, A. (2016). Retraction of Published Papers in Journals. Retrieved 24 October 2023 from http://www.samimnoor.ir/view/fa/ArticleView?itemId=47. (In Persian)
Asnafi, A., Poorhossein, R., & Omidinia, M. (2017). Contribution of Iranian Scholars to Predatory Journals. Librarianship and Information Organization Studies28(3), 93-105. (In Persian)
Aspura, M. Y. I., Noorhidawati, A., & Abrizah, A. (2018). An analysis of Malaysian retracted papers: Misconduct or mistakes? Scientometrics, 115(3), 1315–1328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2720-z
Babaii, E., & Nejadghanbar, H. (2017). Plagiarism Among Iranian Graduate Students of Language Studies: Perspectives and Causes. Ethics & Behavior, 27(3), 240-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2016.1138864. (In Persian)
Callaway, Ewen. (n.d.). Publisher pulls 58 articles by Iranian scientists over authorship manipulation. Nature News. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.20916
Campos-Varela, I., Villaverde-Castañeda, R., & Ruano-Raviña, A. (2020). Retraction of publications: A study of biomedical journals retracting publications based on impact factor and journal category. Gaceta Sanitaria, 34(5), 430–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.05.008
Chen, W., Xing, Q. R., Wang, H., & Wang, T. (2018). Retracted publications in the biomedical literature with authors from mainland China. Scientometrics, 114(1), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2565-x
Christopher M. M. (2022). Comprehensive analysis of retracted journal articles in the field of veterinary medicine and animal health. BMC veterinary research, 18(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03167-x
COPE Council. (2019). COPE Guidelines: Retraction Guidelines.
https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.4
Dal-Ré, R., & Ayuso, C. (2019). Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018. Journal of Medical Genetics, 56(11), 734–740.
Didier, E., & Guaspare-Cartron, C. (2018). The new watchdogs’ vision of science: A roundtable with Ivan Oransky (Retraction Watch) and Brandon Stell (PubPeer). Social Studies of Science, 48(1), 165-167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718756202
Elango, B. (2021). Retracted articles in the biomedical literature from Indian authors. Scientometrics, 126(5), 3965-3981.
Elango, B., Kozak, M., & Rajendran, P. (2019). Analysis of retractions in Indian science. Scientometrics, 119(2), 1081–1094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03079-y
Gharavi, A. (2019). Difference between Retraction and Article Withdrawal. Knowledge and Healthy in Medical Science, 14(4), 1. (In Persian)
Ghorbi, A., Fahimifar, S. & Noruzi, A (2023). Citation Analysis and Reasons for Retraction in Middle Eastern Countries. Scientometrics Research Journal. 17: 99-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2021.13819.1472. (In Persian)
Ghorbi, A., & Fahimifar, S. (2020). Aspects and Collaboration Patterns of Retracted Papers as Evidence of Research Misconduct in Iran and Foreign countries. Scientometrics Research Journal. 11: 149-172. https://doi.org/10.22070/rsci.2019.4392.1287. (In Persian)
Glasnović, A., Krajna, T., & Petrak, J. (2019). Retracted articles by Croatian authors: A case study. European Science Editing, 45(4), 85–88.
Grieneisen, M. L., & Zhang, M. (2012). A comprehensive survey of retracted articles from the scholarly literature. PloS ONE, 7(10), e44118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044118
Hamdipour A, Atapour. H. & Mirpanahi. S. (2022). An analysis of the retraction trend of scientific documents indexed on the Web of Science during the Years 2000-2020. CJS. 9 (1), 82-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.22088/cjs.9.1.82. (In Persian)
Huh, S., Kim, S. Y., & Cho, H. M. (2016). Characteristics of retractions from Korean medical journals in the KoreaMed database: A bibliometric analysis. PLoS ONE, 11(10), e0163588. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163588
Jamali Mahmouei, H., Jashirehnezhadi, F., & Alimohammadi, D. (2017). Contribution of Iranians to journals published by predatory publishers in 2015. Librarianship and Information Organization Studies, 28(3), 8-92. (In Persian)
Janavi, E., & Moradi, S. (2018). Citation fate of world retracted articles: The comparative study of humanities, medical science, engineering science and pure science. Iranian Journal of Information Management, 4(1), 25-40. (In Persian)
Kamali, N., Talebi Bezmin Abadi, A., & Rahimi, F. (2020). Plagiarism, fake peer-review, and duplication: predominant reasons underlying retractions of Iran-affiliated scientific papers. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(6), 3455–3463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00274-6 (In Persian)
Kamali, N., Rahimi, F., & Talebi Bezmin Abadi, A. (2022). Learning from retracted papers authored by the highly cited Iran-affiliated researchers: Revisiting research policies and a key message to clarivate analytics. Science and engineering ethics, 28(2), 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00368-3 (In Persian)
Kocyigit, B. F., & Akyol, A. (2022). Analysis of retracted publications in the biomedical literature from Turkey. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 37(18), e142. https://doi.org/10.3346%2Fjkms.2022.37.e142
Lei, L., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Lack of improvement in scientific integrity: An analysis of WOS retractions by Chinese researchers (1997–2016). Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(5), 1409–1420.
Mansourzadeh, M. J., Ghazimirsaeid, J., Motamedi, N., Najafi, A., Abdullahi Abubakar, A., & Dehdarirad, H. (2021). A survey of Iranian retracted publications indexed in PubMed. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 50(1), 188–194. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i1.5086
Mohamadloo, A., & Batooli, Z. (2020). A scientometric and content analysis of research output on "Retracted Papers" indexed in Scopus. Feyz, 24 (4), 446-461. http://feyz.kaums.ac.ir/article-1-4121-fa.html. (In Persian)
Mohammad Hosseinpur, R., Bagheri Nevisi, R., & Afzali Shahri, M. (2015). An investigation of the reasons for committing plagiarism in the Iranian academic community: Editor-in-chiefs, professors, and students' perspective. Linguistic research in foreign languages, 7(2), 555-587. https://doi.org/10.22059/jflr.2017.239520.374.
Moradi, Sh. & Janavi, E. (2016). A scientometrics study of Iranian retracted paper. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 33(4), 1789-1808. https://doi.org/10.35050/JIPM010.2018.034 (In Persian)
Moradi, S., Janavi, E., & Kazemi, H. (2018). A Comparative Study of Scientific Misconduct through the World. Librarianship and Information Organization Studies, 28(4), 75-94. (In Persian)
Morovati, M., & Riahinia, N. (2017). Retractions in endocrinology and metabolism journals: Causes and characteristics. Journal of Health Administration, 22(4), 50-61. (In Persian)
Morovati, M., & Erfanmanesh, M. (2021). Retraction of scholarly outputs and instances of research misbehavior. Ethics in Science and Technology. 15(4), 62-69. http://ethicsjournal.ir/article-1-2083-fa.html(In Persian)
Nogueira, T. E., Gonçalves, A. S., Leles, C. R., Batista, A. C., & Costa, L. R. (2017). A survey of retracted articles in dentistry. BMC Research Notes, 10(1), 253. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2576-y
Poroushasb, S. (2018). Pathology and study of the Iranian retracted papers in Scopus, Google Scholar, and Research gate Databases Between 1997-2017. Sciences and Techniques of Information Management4(2), 137-156. https://doi.org/10.22091/stim.2018.3054.1200 (In Persian)
Pourhoseingholi, M. A., Rahimibashar, F., Khosh Fetrat, M., & Vahedian-Azimi, A. (2021). Is the ratio of retracted Iranian papers compatible with their research growth Rate? An international database survey. Hospital Practices and Research, 6(1), 29-34. https://doi.org/10.34172/hpr.2021.06
Pournaghi, R. (2017). Plagiarism among university students: A systematic review and meta-analysis study. Tehran. Iranian Research Institute for Information and Technology (IranDoc). (In Persian)
Rai, R., & Sabharwal, S. (2017). Retracted publications in orthopedics: Prevalence, characteristics, and trends. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 99(9), e44. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.16.01116
Sa’adat, M. (2021). Iran's situation in terms of the number of retracted articles. The first national conference of Ideal University in the second step of the revolution. (In Persian)
Sadeh, S.; Mirramezani, M.; Mesgaran, M. B.; Feizpour, A.; & Azadi, P. (2019). The scientific output of Iran: Quantity, quality, and corruption, Working Paper 7, Stanford Iran 2040 Project, Stanford University.
Shenavar A., & Rezaei Sharifabadi S. (2022). Investigating the effect of the nature of access to articles in retracted them: A case study of Iranian researchers' scholarly production. Caspian Journal of Scientometrics, 9 (2), 74-84, http://dx.doi.org/10.22088/cjs.9.2.74. (In Persian)
Stavale, R., Ferreira, G. I., Galvão, J. A., Zicker, F., Novaes, M. R., Oliveira, C. M., et al (2019). Research misconduct in health and life sciences research: A systematic review of retracted literature from Brazilian institutions. PLoS ONE, 14(4).
Stone, Richard. (2016). Iranian Sun. Science, 353 (6304), 1083.
Stricker, J., & Günther, A. (2019). Scientific misconduct in psychology. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 227(1), 53–63.
Xu, S. B. & Hu, G. (2025). Research retraction and its communication. In M. Khosrow-Pour, D.B.A. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Sixth Edition. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-7366-5.ch030
Zakersalehi, Gh. (2017). Scientific cheating: Legal and social aspects. Tehran: Institute for Cultural, Social and Civilization Studies. (In Persian)