Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1 Department of Information Technology Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Research & Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Visiting Professor, Faculty of Management and Economics, Research & Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Department of Management, Faculty of Management, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch,Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Keywords
منابع
آدینه، رضا (1400). هوشمندسازی امنیت و مقابله با تهدیدات پیشرفته. تهران: موسسه فرهنگی هنری دیباگران.
آسوشه، عباس (1390). هستاننگاری:روششناسی، ابزارها و زبان های توسعه. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.
ثروتی، لیلا؛ ولوی، محمدرضا؛ و حورعلی، مریم (1393).کاربردهای هستانشناسی در امور نظامی و متدولوژی هستانشناسی نظامی، هفتمین کنفرانس ملی انجمن فرماندهی و کنترل (C4I) ایران؛ دانشگاه علوم و فنون هوایی شهید ستاری https://civilica.com/doc/412525
رجبی، زینب؛ و علینقیزاده اردستانی، مهدی (1398). ارائه یک روش داده محور برای توسعه معماری سازمانی با استفاده از مدل هستانشناسی سازمانی. فرماندهی و کنترل، 3(3)،16-45 http://ic4i-journal.ir/article-1-163-fa.html
صابری فر، رستم (1399). تعیین و تشخیص عوامل مؤثر در طراحی سازمان هوشمند برای مدیریت شهری. پژوهشهای جغرافیایی برنامهریزی شهری، 8(2) ، 445-467
علی آبادی، سبحان؛ محروقی، حمیدرضا؛ و زارع، مهناز (1396). ارائه مدل مرجع امنیت در چارچوب معماری سازمانی ایران؛ اولین همایش ملی پیشرفتهای معماری سازمانی دانشکده مهندسی و علوم کامپیوتر دانشگاه شهید بهشتی. https://civilica.com/doc/737972/
فتحیاندستگردی، اکرم (1399). طراحی الگوی هستانشناسی فرادادهای برای مدلسازی و بازنمون معنایی مقالات نشریات علمی در پایگاه رایسست، مرکز منطقهای اطلاع رسانی علوم و فناوری (رایسست).
قلم بر، محمد امین؛ عبادى، سید محمد علی؛ کرمى، خسرو (1401). کلان روندهاى فناورى به روایت 8 موسسه برتر مشاوره مدیریت جهان. تهران: واحد مطالعات راهبردى و آینده پژوهى شرکت سرمایه گذارى دى، انتشارات کاریز.
محروقی، حمیدرضا؛ علی آبادی، سبحان؛ و خیرخواه، محیا (1396). بررسی و مقایسه ی چارچوب ها و مدلهای امنیت در معماری سازمانی، اولین همایش ملی پیشرفت معماری سازمانی https://civilica.com/doc/7379
نجاری، رضا؛ آذر، عادل؛ و جلیلیان، حمیدرضا (1394). ارائه مدل هوشمندی سازمان: مورد مطالعه شرکت های تولیدی. مطالعات رفتار سازمانی؛ 4(1)، 1-24.
نظامی، درنا؛ و شمسعینی، فریدون (1396). پشتیبانی از تصمیمات معماری سازمانی با استفاده از هستانشناسی. همایش ملی پیشرفتهای معماری سازمانی. https://civilica.com/doc/737955
وزارت ارتباطات و فناوری اطلاعات (1402). برنامه راهبردی دولت هوشمند ایران. تهران: وزارت ارتباطات و فناوری اطلاعات.
References
Adina, R. (2021). Smartening security and dealing with advanced threats. Dibagaran Art Cultural Institute of Tehran. (In Persian)
Alberts, C. J. Dorofee, A. J. & Allen, J. H. (2001). OCTAVE catalog of practices, version 2.0. Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute. https://doi.org/10.1184/R1/6575834.v1
Aliabadi, S., Mahrooghi, H., & Zare, M. (2016). Presenting the reference model of security in the framework of Iran's organizational architecture; 1st national conference on organizational architecture developments, Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Shahid Beheshti University. (In Persian) https://civilica.com/doc/737972/
Assouche, A. (2010). Ethnography: methodology, development tools and languages. Tarbiat Modares University Publications. (In Persian)
Bitton, R., Maman, N., Elovici, Y., & Shabta, A. (2021). Evaluating the cybersecurity risk of real world, machine learning production systems. arXiv, arxiv.org/abs/2107.01806 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.01806
Fethian Tasgardi, A. (2019). Designing a metadata ontology model for modeling and semantic representation of scientific journal articles in the Rice database. Regional Science and Technology Information Center (RAISEST). (In Persian)
Gasevic, D., Djuric, D., & Devedzi, V. )2009(. Model driven engineering and ontology development. (2nd ed.). Springer.
Gharib, M., & Mylopoulos, J. (2018). A core ontology for privacy requirements engineering. arXiv:1811.12621v1[cs.SE]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1811.12621
Jacobs, S. )2011(. Engineering information security: The Application of Systems Engineering Concepts to Achieve Information Assurance. Wiely.
Kalfoglou, Y., & Schorlemmer, M. (2003). IF-Map: An ontology-mapping method based on information-flow theory. Journal on data semantics, 1, 98-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39733-55
Kumar A. (2013). A comparative analysis of taxonomy, thesaurus and ontology. International Journal of Applied Services Marketing Perspectives, 2, 251-258.
Lang, D., & Rumsey, C. (2018). Business disruption is here to stay what should learners do? Are Business leaders prepared to handle future business disruptions? 11th IBAB International Conference.
Mahler, T., Elovici, Y. & Shahar, Y. (2020). A new methodology for information security risk assessment for medical devices and its evaluation. arXiv:2002.06938v1[CR]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2002.06938
Mahrooqi, H., Aliabadi, S., & Khairkhah, M. (2016). Review and comparison of security frameworks and models in organizational architecture. 1st national conference on the advancement of enterprise architecture. (In Persian) https://civilica.com/doc/737951.
Manzoor, S., Vateva-Gurova, T., Trapero, R. & Suri, N. (2018). Threat modeling the cloud: An ontology based approach. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Information and Operational Technology, 61-72. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12085-6_6
Mavroeidis, V., & Bromander, S. (2021). Cyber threat intelligence model: An evaluation of taxonomies, sharing standards, and ontologies within cyber threat intelligence. 2017 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (EISIC). https://doi.org/10.1109/EISIC.2017.20
Ministry of Communications and Information Technology. (2023). Iran's Smart Government Strategic Plan. Tehran: Ministry of Communications and Information Technology. (In Persian)
Najari, R., Azar, A., & Jalilian, H. (2014). Presenting the intelligence model of the organization: the study of manufacturing companies. Organizational Behavior Studies Quarterly, 4 1 (12) 1-24. (In Persian)
Nizami, D., & Shams Aini, F. (2016). Supporting enterprise architecture decisions using ontology. National Conference on Organizational Architecture Advances. (In Persian) https://civilica.com/doc/737955.
Nizami, D.; & Shams Aini, F. (2016). Supporting enterprise architecture decisions using ontology. National Conference on Organizational Architecture Advances. (In Persian) https://civilica.com/doc/737955.
Qalambar, M. A., Ebadi, S. M. A., & Karami, K. (2022). Major technological trends according to the worlds top 8 management consulting institutes. Strategic Studies and Foresight Unit of D Investment Company, Kariz Publications. (In Persian)
Qamar, T., & Bawany, N. Z. (2020). A cyber security ontology for smart city. International Journal on Information Technologies & Security, 3(12), Corpus ID: 235753202
Rajabi, Z., & Alinaghizadehardestani, M. (2018). Presenting a data-driven method for the development of enterprise architecture using the enterprise ontology model. Command and control of the third year, 3. (In Persian) http://ic4i-journal.ir/article-1-163-fa.html
Rastogi, N., Dutta, S., J. Zaki, M., Gittens, A., & Aggarwal, C. (2020). MALOnt: An ontology for malware threat intelligence. arXiv:2006.11446v1 [cs.CR]. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.11446.
Rogushina, J., Gladun, A., Pryima, S. & Strokan, O. (2019). Ontology-based approach to validation of learning outcomes for information security domain. CEUR-WS.org 2577(3). Corpus ID: 215807305. http://www.tsatu.edu.ua/kn/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/skopus_2019.pdf
Saberifar, R. (2019). Determining and identifying effective factors in the design of intelligent organization for urban management. Urban Planning Geography Research, 8(2), 445-467. (In Persian)
Saif, A. (2014). Security Architecture as Part of Enterprise Architecture, School of Information and Communication Technology. Griffith University, Australia.
Sanagavarapu, L., Iyer, V., & Reddy, Y. (2021). OntoEnricher: A Deep learning approach for ontology enrichment from unstructured text. arXiv:2102.04081v1. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.08554
Sarvati, L., Valvi, M., & Hourali, M. (2013). Applications of ontology in military affairs and methodology of military ontology; The 7th National Conference of the Command and Control Association (C4I) of Iran; Shahid Sattari University of Aeronautical Sciences and Techniques; November 2013. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/412525
Sarvati, L., Valvi, M. & Hourali, M. (2013). Applications of ontology in military affairs and methodology of military ontology; The 7th National Conference of the Command and Control Association (C4I) of Iran; Shahid Sattari University of Aeronautical Sciences and Techniques; November 2013. (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/412525
Sherwood, J., Clark, A. & Lynas, D. (2005). Enterprise Security architecture: A business-driven approach. CMP Book.
Studer, R., Benjamins, V. R., & Fensel, D. (1998(. Knowledge engineering: Principles and methods, Data & Knowledge Engineering, 25(1–2), 161–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-023X(97)00056-6
Syed, R. & Zhong, H. (2018). Cybersecurity vulnerability management: An Ontology-Based Conceptual Model. In Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Americas Conference on Information Systems, New Orleans, LA, USA, 16-18. Corpus ID: 53046758
Van, R. (2014). Comparing Security Architectures. Lulea University of Technology, Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering.
Wang, Z., Zhu, H.; Liu, P. & Sun, L. (2021). Social Engineering in Cybersecurity: A Domain Ontology and Knowledge Graph Application Examples. Future issue of cybersecurity (ISSN: 2523-3246). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42400-021-00094-6
Wen, S. F., & Katt, B. (2019). Managing Software Security Knowledge in Context: An Ontology Based Approach. Information, 10, 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10060216
Whitman, M. E. & Mattord, H. J. (2012(. Principles of information security (4th Ed.). Course Cengage Learning.
Yu, L. )2007(. Introduction to the Semantic Web and Semantic Web Services. Taylor & Francis, United States of America. https://doi.org/10.1201/978158488934