The Role of Scientific Language in Citation Count and Altmetric Score of Academic Publications

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department Information Science, Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc), Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Objective: Writing in plain language is recommended in all communities, including the academic community, and researchers are consistently encouraged to write their research findings and papers in a simple manner. One principle of plain language is the use of simple vocabulary. In other words, researchers are encouraged to use fewer technical terms and jargon in their writing and instead opt for simple and understandable words. However, it is unclear whether plain language can lead to increased impact of research papers. This study aimed to answer this question by examining a selection of articles from the journal 'Applied Linguistics.' The primary objective of this research was to understand the role of scientific language in the number of citations and Altmetric scores of research articles in the 'Applied Linguistics' journal.
Method: This research was conducted in two key steps: (1) content analysis of scientific articles to determine the extent of the use of technical terms and jargon, and (2) extracting data related to the impact of scientific articles, such as the number of citations and Altmetric scores, and comparing this data with the extent of the use of technical terms and jargon. Articles from the 'Applied Linguistics' journal were selected both purposefully and randomly. The software 'MAXQDA' was used to identify the number of difficult words, and the 'Dimensions' platform was used to identify the impact of these articles.
Results: The findings showed that the highest proportion of difficult words in the examined articles was 1.76%, and the lowest was 0.15%. In other words, in the most difficult article (among the research sample), there were nearly 18 difficult words per thousand words. On the other hand, the average field-weighted citation rate for the selected articles was around 24. Statistical tests showed a negative correlation between the use of difficult words in articles and the number of citations/Altmetric scores, but this relationship was not statistically significant, and therefore the research hypotheses could not be confirmed.
Conclusions: This research indicated that there is no significant correlation between plain language and the impact and attention given to academic works. Therefore, it cannot be claimed that the simpler academic texts are, the more attention they receive. However, one reason for the lack of this relationship could be the citation behavior of researchers, which can be influenced by many variables. Although the relationship between plain language and the impact of scientific works is not significant, this should not discourage researchers from writing simply, as it is certain that simpler texts are easier to understand and have a wider audience than more difficult ones.

Keywords

References

References
Adler, M. (2012). The plain language movement. The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law. Edited by Lawrence M. Solan and Peter M. Tiersma https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0006
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H‐D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64 (1), 45-80. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150
Bretherton, D., & Law, S. F. (Eds.). (2015). Methodologies in peace psychology: Peace research by peaceful means. Switzerland: Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18395-4
Carr, S. (2002). Tackling NHS jargon - Getting the message across. Radcliffe Medical Press, Oxford.            Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10(1),121 – 124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2003.00443.x
Case, D. O., & Higgins, G. M. (2000). How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51(7), 635-645. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:73.0.CO;2-H
Critchfield, T. S., Doepke, K. J., Kimberly Epting, L., Becirevic, A., Reed, D. D., Fienup, D. M., ... & Ecott, C. L. (2017). Normative emotional responses to behavior analysis jargon or how not to use words to win friends and influence people. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 10, 97-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0161-9
Federal Plain Language Guidelines. (2011). Plain Language Action and Information Network. Plain Language Action and Information Network develops. Federal Plain Language Guidelines. http://plainlanguage.gov/media/FederalPLGuidelines.pdf
Fraumann, G. (2018). The values and limits of altmetrics. New Directions for Institutional Research, 178, 53-69. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.20267
Greene, A.E. (2013). Writing science in plain English. The University of Chicago Press.
Haustein, S. (2016). Grand challenges in altmetrics: Heterogeneity, data quality and dependencies. Scientometrics, 108(1), 413–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1910-9
Higgins, C. (2021). Journal editor's preface to the special issue. Applied Linguistics, 42(6), 1041–1042. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab067
Hurd, J. M. (2000). The transformation of scientific communication: A model for 2020. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14), 1279-1283. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999%3C::AID-ASI1044%3E3.0.CO;2-1
Koch, T., Vanderstraeten, R., & Ayala, R. (2021). Making science international: Chilean journals and communities in the world of science. Social Studies of Science, 51(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720949709
LeBaron, M. (2015). Writing peace psychology: Creating high-impact peace research scholarship. In: Bretherton, D., Law, S. (eds.), Methodologies in Peace Psychology. Peace Psychology Book Series, Vol. 26. Springer, pp. 399-422., Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18395-4_21
Leydesdorff, L., (1998). Theories of citation?. Scientometrics, 43 (4), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458391
Lindsley, O. R. (1991). From technical jargon to plain english for application. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(3), 449-458. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1991.24-449
Moldwin, M. B., & Liemohn, M. W. (2018). High-citation papers in space physics: Examination of gender, country, and paper characteristics. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 123(4), 2557–2565. https://doi.org/10.1002/2018JA025291
Petelin, R. (2010). Considering plain language: Issues and initiatives. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15(2), 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563281011037964
Radhakrishnan, N. (2017). Book of academic journal: Editing and publishing launch one your own. India: Notion Press.
Reitz, J.M. (2024). “Citation”. ODLIS: Online Dictionary of Library and Information Science. https://odlis.abc-clio.com/odlis_c.html
Rohan, A., & Fullerton, J. (2019). Effects of a programme to advance scholarly writing. The Clinical Teacher, 16(6), 580-584. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12979
Rudd, R. E., Kaphingst, K., Colton, T., Gregoire, J., & Hyde, J. (2004). Rewriting public health information in plain language. Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives, 9(3), 195-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730490447039
Sommer, D. (2017). Creating impact resonance through a culture of holistic discoverability. Learned Publishing, 30, 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1081
Tahamtan, I.; Safipour Afshar, A., & Ahamdzadeh, K. (2016). Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1195–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2
Viers, C.J. (2009). Research informing practice: Increasing its impact. NAFSA‘s 61st Annual Conference, Thursday, May 28, 2009, Los Angeles, CA. doi=10.1.1.619.7452&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Wang, Q.A. (2021). Principle of least effort vs. maximum efficiency: Deriving Zipf-Pareto’s laws. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 153(1). December 2021, 111489 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111489
Williams, J. M. (1995). Book of style: Toward clarity and grace. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Wolfram, W. (2000). Linguistic diversity and the public interest. American Speech, 75 (3), 278-280.
Academic Librarianship and Information Research
Volume 58, Issue 2
June 2024
Pages 75-86

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics