بررسی رابطه متغیرهای چندگانه (مطلوبیت اجتماعی، هنجارهای ذهنی، خودکارآمدی تحصیلی، احتمال سرقت علمی، دانش سرقت علمی، هدف، فشار، مدیریت زمان، ریسک) با سرقت علمی در بین دانشجویان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور

2 دانشگاه پیام نور

3 هیأت علمی دانشگاه پیام نور

چکیده

هدف: تعیین رابطه متغیرهای چندگانه هدف موقعیتی علمی، فشار، هنجارهای‌ذهنی، درک خطر، دانش سرقت‌علمی، خودکارآمدی تحصیلی و متغیر تعدیل‌کننده مدیریت‌ زمان با احتمال سرقت علمی در مدل جانسون، هدف اصلی پژوهش حاضر می‌باشد.
روش‌شناسی: این پژوهش از نوع کاربردی- همبستگی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش را دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشگاه ایلام تشکیل دادند ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها در این پژوهش، پرسشنامه‌های خود توسعه‌یافته هدف موقعیتی، فشار، درک خطر، و مدیریت‌زمان (جانسون، 2018)؛ هنجارهای ذهنی مونتانا و کسپزیک (2008)، خودکارآمدی تحصیلی داونپورت و لن (2006)، احتمال سرقت علمی شرد و همکاران (2002) و دانش سرقت علمی یئو (2007) بود. جهت تجزیه وتحلیل داده‌ها از ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری در نرم‌افزار وارپ پی ال اس استفاده شد.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد که بین تمام متغیرهای مدل جانسون (2018) با احتمال سرقت علمی در پژوهش حاضر همبستگی معنادار و برخلاف این مدل در این پژوهش، بین فشار و دانش سرقت علمی با خودکارآمدی نیز ارتباط معناداری مشاهده می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The relationship between multiple variables (social desirability, mental norms, academic self- efficacy, plagiarism knowledge, purpose, pressure, time management, risk) and the possibility of plagiarism among students

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Akbar Khasseh 1
  • sodabeh rostaee 2
  • faramarz soheili 3
  • mehri shahbazi 2
1 Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Payame Noor University
2 Payame Noor University
3 Department of Library and Information Science, Payame Noor University
چکیده [English]

the purpose of present research was to determine the relationship between multiple variables (social desirability, mental norms, academic self- efficacy, plagiarism knowledge, purpose, pressure, time management, risk) with the possibility of plagiarism among post- graduate students of Ilam University.
Methodology: the present research is applied in terms of purpose and is survey in terms of research implementation. It is a correlation research in terms of the manner of collecting the required data and the relationship between the variables. The statistical population of the present research includes all post- graduate students of Ilam university.The questionnaire was distributed among them by random sampling and self- developed questionnaires of risk, time management, pressure, objective and policy of APA Johnson (2018), mental norms questionnaire of Montana & Kespzick (2008), Academic self- efficacy questionnaire of Downport & Lan (2006), the possibility of plagiarism questionnaire of Shred et al (2002), plagiarism questionnaire of Yeh (2007). In data analysis, simple correlation coefficient and Structural equation modeling was used in WARP PLS software.
Findings: The results of research showed that excessive pressure on students to do homework beyond their ability, lack of knowledge about plagiarism and plagiarism knowledge, as well as poor time management to do homework on time cause students to turn to this immoral phenomenon. Therefore, university administrators and professors can reduce the prevalence of this phenomenon by holding educational classes on plagiarism and its consequences, increasing students’ self- efficacy, creating a proper culture and also teaching proper time management, and prevent it from being committed.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Plagiarism
  • Social Desirability
  • mental norms
  • academic self- efficacy

References

Abalkina, A., & Libman, A. (2020). The real costs of plagiarism: Russian governors, plagiarized PhD theses, and infrastructure in Russian regions. Scientometrics, 1-28.

Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, Structure and students motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 0(3): 260-267.

Abasi, A. R., & Graves, B. (2008). Academic literacy and plagiarism: Conversations with international graduate students and disciplinary professors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(4), 221-233.

Ahmadi, A. (2014). Plagiarism in the academic context: A study of Iranian EFL learners. Research‌ Ethics, 10(3), 151–168.

Akram, M. S., Malik, A., Shareef, M. A., & Goraya, M. A. S. (2019). Exploring the interrelationships between technological predictors and behavioral mediators in online tax filing: The moderating role of perceived risk. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 237-251.

Babaii, E. & Nejadghanbar, H. (2017). Plagiarism among Iranian graduate students of language studies: Perspectives and causes. Ethics & Behavior, 27(3), 240-258.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs ,Prentice – Hall.

Blum, S. D. (2009). My word!: Plagiarism and college culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Caldwell, C. (2010). A ten-step model for academic integrity: A positive approach for business schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 92 (1), 1-13.

Devonport, T. J., & Lane, A. M. (2006). Relationships between self-efficacy, coping and student retention. Social Behavior and Personality,34(4),127-138.https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2006.34.2.127.

Eret, E., & Ok, A. (2014). Internet plagiarism in higher education: tendencies, triggering factors and reasonsamong teacher candidates. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39 (8), 1002-1016.

Fanelli D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PloS one ,4(5), e5738.

Goh, E. (2015). Exploring underlying motivations behind extreme cases of plagiarism in tourism and hospitality education. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 27(2), 80-84.

Gallant, T. B., &Drinan, P. (2006). Institutionalizing academic integrity. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(1),344-356.

Halupa, C. M., Breitenbach, E., & Anast, A. (2016). A self-plagiarism intervention for doctoral students: a qualitative pilot study. Journal of Academic Ethics, 14 (3), 175-189. DOI: 10.1007/s10805-016-9262-x.

Laurent, M. R. (2020). Wikipedia, the free online medical encyclopedia anyone can plagiarize: time to address Wiki-plagiarism. Publishing Research Quarterly, 36(3), 399-402.

Montano, D. E., & Kasprzyk, D. (2008). Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, and the integrated behavioral model. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory research and practice (4th ed., pp. 67-96). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dedding/plagiarize (2020).

Johnson, E.D. (2018). Situational Cheating Assessment of Motivation (SCAM): A Model for Understanding Student Plagiarism. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 – 1346.

Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles & Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Second Edition, New York: The Guilford Press.

Love, P.G., Simmons, J., (1998). Factors influencing cheating and plagiarism among graduate students in a college of education. College Student Journal 32 (4), 539–551.

Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101–134.

Park C. (2003). In other (people’s) words: plagiarism by University students-literature and lessons. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28 (5), 471-488.

Pecorari, D. (2003). Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic secondlanguage writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(4), 317-345.

Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing others' words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 201-230.

Pervin, L., John, O.P. (2001). Personality: Theory and research. (Eighth edition). Aeeizh.

Riasati, M. J., & Rahimi, F. (2013). Why do Iranian postgraduate students plagiarize? A qualitative investigation. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 14(3), 309-317.

Pupovac, V., Bilic-Zulle, L., Mavrinac, M., & Petrovecki, M. (2010). Attitudes toward plagiarism among pharmacy and medical biochemistry students- cross-sectional survey study. Biochemia Medica, 20(3), 307-313.

Sheard, J., Dick, M., Markham, S., Macdonald, I., & Walsh, M. (2002). Cheating and plagiarism: Perceptions and practices of first year IT students. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin,34(3),183-187.doi:10.1145/637610.544468.

Horbach, Serge, Halffman,Willem (2019). The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’. journal homepage. 48(5), 492-502.

Trasberg, K., & Ligi, M. (2014). University students’ reasons for committing academic fraud and knowledge about regulations: A qualitative interview study. Educational Studies Moscow,32(4), 184-208.

Uzun, Ahmet Murat; Kilis, Selcan (2020). Investigating antecedents of plagiarism using extended theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 144(34), 556-678.

Wilhoit, S. (1994). Helping students avoid plagiarism. College Teaching, 42(4), 161-164.

Whitley BE, Keith-Spiegel JP. (2002). Academic dishonesty an educator's guide. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Yeo, S. (2007). First‐year university science and engineering students’ understanding of plagiarism. High Education Research & Development, 26(5),45-55, 199-216.doi:10.1080/07294360701310813.